2022 Graduate Student Science Writing Workshop
Tuesday, February 15, 2022
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
2:30 PM - 4:30 PM
Instructor: Carl Zimmer
Workshop registration: Registration opens [DATE TO BE SET] to all graduate students. To register, please complete the registration form at [LINK TO BE SET] (note that you will be required to sign into your Yale account). If you do not have a Yale ID and wish to register and attend the sessions, please email firstname.lastname@example.org (link sends e-mail)
Workshop objectives: This workshop will introduce science graduate students to writing about science for a broad, non-scientist audience.
About the instructor: Carl Zimmer is professor adjunct, Yale MBB, a columnist for The New York Times, and the author of 14 books about science.
First meeting: Tuesday, February 15, 2022, 2:30 - 4:30
This session will begin with a discussion about science writing, considering techniques required for good science writing. We will use the assigned reading below as the basis for the discussion.
I will describe in some detail how I produced one of my own articles, starting with the paper on which it was based.
Finally, we will discuss the course assignment (details below).
Ian Bogost. “Scholars Shouldn’t Fear Dumbing Down.” The Atlantic, October 26, 2018 https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/scholars-shouldnt-fe... (link is external)
I highly recommend these two books:
Steven Pinker, The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. (Amazon page http://www.amazon.com/The-Sense-Style-Thlnklng-Persons/dp/0670025852 (link is external)(link is external))
Siri Carpenter, editor. The Craft of Science Writing https://www.theopennotebook.com/the-craft-of-science-writing/ (link is external)
EXAMPLES OF SCIENCE WRITING
Natalie Wolchover, “Quantum Mischief Rewrites the Laws of Cause and Effect.” Quanta, https://www.quantamagazine.org/quantum-mischief-rewrites-the-laws-of-cau...
Ed Yong, “Why the Coronavirus Has Been So Successful,” The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/03/biography-new-corona... (link is external)
FROM PAPER TO ARTICLE:
Temmam, S., Vongphayloth, K., Salazar, E.B., Munier, S., Bonomi, M., Régnault, B., Douangboubpha, B., Karami, Y., Chretien, D., Sanamxay, D. and Xayaphet, V., 2021. Coronaviruses with a SARS-CoV-2-like receptor-binding domain allowing ACE2-mediated entry into human cells isolated from bats of Indochinese peninsula. Preprint.
“Newly Discovered Bat Viruses Give Hints to Covid’s Origins” New York Times, October 14, 2021
Questions to consider: What in the paper is in the article? What is missing? How does the article go beyond the paper? How does the article portray the way science is done? What key concepts are required to understand the research?
Pick a new scientific paper in an area of your choosing. Write a 600-word explanation of the research.
You are free to choose the style in which you write your assignment. It may be an opinion piece, a piece of straight news reporting as you’d see in a newspaper, or a more creative piece you might find in a magazine.
However, you approach it, you must explain why the scientists did the research, how they did it, and what they learned from it-and in such a way that a lay reader can understand it (and even enjoy it).
The first step towards good writing is good language. So, avoid all jargon, no matter how tempting. See here for an index of words I’ve banned from previous classes: https://irregardless.ly/style_guides/13?name=popular&collection_id=13 (link is external)
To research your piece, read the paper, look for any commentaries in the journals, and find background reading for context. If necessary, try to find a grad student at Yale or elsewhere who can take you through the research.
Be sure to include the citation of the paper on your assignment.
Since the assignment is due three days after the first workshop, I’d recommend starting on it before we meet. It may look like a quick task, but many grad students who have taken my workshop have told me it took a lot longer than they expected!
Assignments are due by Friday, February 18 , 2022 at 5 pm . Email them to me at email@example.com
Please note that I will only be able to evaluate pieces by the first 20 students who registered for the workshop. However, all registrants are welcome to attend both sessions, complete the assignment, and participate in the discussions about the assignment in the second session. In order to participate in the second session, waiting list students will need to read the writing assignments I distribute for discussion, and write comments.
I will send all workshop students two pieces. Before the next session, all participants in the second session (Including waiting list students) will be required to write a 100-word critique of each article we will be discussing. The critique should describe a strong point of the article, and suggest a way to improve it. Workshop participants will email copies of their critiques to me and the authors by Monday night and be prepared to discuss them in the second meeting.
Second Meeting: Tuesday, February 22, 2022, 2:30 pm to 4:30 pm.
We will begin this session discussing the writing assignment. Most likely, you will have encountered unexpected challenges, which you are encouraged to describe. We will also discuss the sample pieces I will have distributed the previous Friday. You will be expected to offer constructive criticism about how the stories could be improved.
After discussing the writing assignment, we will survey the many opportunities for writing about science available today, from magazines to blogs to books to radio. We should have additional time for any topics that students wish to discuss further